To hear Todd Gitlin tell it, the pride that the mainstream press takes in its watchdog role is more than a little misplaced – but that doesn’t mean the ideal is any less important.   And with media fragmentation in the age of the Internet, people more than ever need institutions of some kind that […]

To hear Todd Gitlin tell it, the pride that the mainstream press takes in
its watchdog role is more than a little misplaced – but that doesn’t mean the
ideal is any less important.


And with media fragmentation in the
age of the Internet, people more than ever need institutions of some kind that
will “connect the dots” of day-to-day events and create a coherent, truthful
picture of the world, says Gitlin, the 1960s New Left leader turned media


Whether they’ll get that is another
story. Visiting Milwaukee this week, Gitlin offered an assessment that was
often dour, though lightly leavened with hope.


“I plead for journalism to rise
above a badly smudged history,” he told a packed room at the Marquette
University student union Tuesday afternoon, where he delivered the MU
journalism school’s annual Niemen Lecture. “We need light badly, wherever it
may be found.”


Gitlin bemoaned the distracted and
frivolous nature of much popular media, but found promise in the rise of
serious, nonprofit ventures and the emergence of dissident groups and
individuals lifting the veil from government secrets – the result, he said, of
“a sort of para-jourrnalism in symbiosis with the mainstream media.”


He warned, though, that the
proliferation of voices has not necessarily produced a shared understanding of
the truth by which people can take part in their own self-government – but,
instead, a cacophony in which people can easily limit their own media
consumption to their personal pleasures and prejudices.


 “To speak of the glut of information sources
living in cloud cuckoo land as a democratic improvement is rather too much,” he
said. But when a questioner asked what could be done to change what he called
the “self-confirming bubble,” he admitted, “I don’t think that’s reversible.”


Gitlin comes to the job of academic media analyst
by way of
social-change activist: organizing for nuclear disarmament as an undergrad at
Harvard (where he majored in math), serving as president of Students for a
Democratic Society in the early 1960s, and later organizing demonstrations
against the Vietnam War and against American corporations supporting the
government of South Africa (then under white rule that enforced racial
separation). His dissertation for his Ph.D. in sociology from the University of
California at Berkeley examined the media and the New Left and evolved into his
book, The Whole World Is Watching.


He now heads the Ph.D.
in Communications program
at Columbia University and is a professor of
Journalism and Sociology at the Graduate School of Journalism there. Gitlin has
published prolifically, with poetry and fiction in his portfolio along with a
long list of books on social movements, the media, and related topics. In 2012
he published an e-book, Occupy
Nation:  The Roots, the Spirit, and the
Promise of Occupy Wall Street
, reported and written over about a two-month


The American press, Gitlin told his
Marquette audience, has more often than not fallen well short of the ideals to
which its practitioners and admirers aspire. That goes back to the nation’s
earliest newspapers:  By turns
scurrilous, sensationalist, and partisan, he said, “The press whose freedom was
guaranteed by the first amendment was an unbridled affair.”

RELATED  Bucks VP Alex Lasry Chats About His Bid to Bring the Democratic National Convention to Milwaukee


He pointed to the presidential
campaign pitting John Quincy Adams against Andrew Jackson in 1828. Newspapers,
which blatantly took sides for one or the other contender as they trumpeted personal
scandals, real and invented, about the candidates. “The consequence of this
election was momentous” Gitlin observed – especially, he added, “for the Native
Americans of the Southeast, whom Jackson proceeded to drive over the Mississippi
River.” Yet as an issue, the press all but ignored what it referred to  as “Indian Removal.”

There were moments of glory
, he allowed. Broadcaster Edward R.
on-air editorial condemning Joe McCarthy on TV, and the televised
hearings that exposed the Wisconsin senator as “a dangerous demagogue,” helped
to bring McCarthy down. Coverage of the Civil Rights movement helped catapult
the plight of African Americans in a deeply segregated society into the
national consciousness.


Yet from its treatment of U.S.
sponsored coups in the early 1950s in Iran and Guatemala to coverage of the
Vietnam war so deferential that it read “like sheaves of Pentagon press
releases,” Gitlin saw a far less positive track record for the American press.
“With respect to large matters of state,” he said, “it was more common for
journalistic watchdogs to lick the hands of the perpetrators than not.”


He dissected briefly two
contemporary cases of press failure. The first was the absence of all but the
most superficial coverage of the financial deregulation that unfolded during
the late 1990s and early 2000s  and which
would trigger the economic implosion of 2007-08.


A big reason for that, Gitlin said,
will be explored in a forthcoming book by former Wall Street Journal reporter Dean
The Watchdog That Didn’t
Bark: the Financial Crisis and the Disappearance of Investigative Journalism
The book expands on themes that Starkman has explored in articles for Columbia Journalism Review and Mother Jones.


Gitlin sums the problem up as the
seduction of “access journalism.” In return for the opportunity to regularly
mix with those at the center of power, journalists too often surrender their
critical thinking and skepticism toward the powerful. As a result, they asked
hardly any tough questions about deregulation or the financial dealings that
flourished under it, from growth of subprime mortgages to complicated
instruments like collateralized
debt obligations


 “In so many ways, journalism was complicit in
the predation and corruption that brought down world financial markets and
wrecked the lives of many millions of people,” Gitlin said. “Obsessed with
shallow scoops, giddy from the laughing gas of access, financial journalists
abjectly failed to connect dots and left abusive, reckless and criminal
corporations free to drag the global economy into the abyss unnoticed.”


The second failure has been running
for much longer: the press’s neglect, until recently, to pay serious attention
to global climate change and its human cause – something so close to a
scientific certainty that Gitlin equated the attention paid to industry-funded global-warming
deniers with those who claim the earth is flat.


RELATED  Notre Dame Fire: 'I literally stopped in my tracks and could not believe my eyes'

While news organizations have
finally begun to increase their coverage of climate change, he said, “it’s
rarely linked as it ought to be to endemic draught and starvation and other
forms of extreme earthly phenomenon.”


Still, Gitlin sought to strike a
more optimistic note. He praised the growth of the nonprofit press, exemplified
by the national investigative journalism organization ProPublica and assorted
new local news outlets. And he takes solace in growing collaboration in the mainstream
media, even with – especially with – emerging and controversial
“para-journalists” such as Wikileaks. Databases are among the tools that
journalism can make use of as it seeks to find its way in this new era, he said.


But he also acknowledged that today
it may be more challenging than ever to penetrate the determined lack of
interest in huge swaths of the media-consuming public.


“The question for the world of
fragmented media, where you can choose not only what to know but what not to
know, is whether the casual reader or ‘scroller’ or surfer will be permitted to
slide by happily without even having to survey the larger world,” Gitlin said.
If  so, he continued, “the gulf between the attuned
reader and the know nothings will also likely grow.”


Some footnotes:
Speaking to a handful of grad students later
Tuesday afternoon, Gitlin urged would-be journalists to never settle for the
easy get. He fondly recalled, as a young, newly published writer, being
interviewed by the late Studs
in Chicago – and how Terkel had filled the review copy of the
book with his own notes, circling passages, underlining them, and shaping
questions directly from his reading of the work. “Do your homework,” he
admonished them.


By email I asked Gitlin about the
seeming paradox in his two “failure” examples – the complaint that there was
too little skepticism toward financial deregulation, and yet too much skepticism
toward the scientific consensus about human-caused global climate change.


Gitlin replied by email: “Climate
change is a no-brainer because the relevant experts almost completely agree.
The deniers are nothing but well-funded cranks…”


On the issue of financial
deregulation, he wrote: “I agree with Starkman that access journalism vis-a-vis
the bankers was a giddy distraction. Moreover, for that & other reasons
business journalists ignored deep questions which SOME economists could have
broached to them about over-financialization of the economy, risks of
deregulation, opacity of derivatives, etc. Here, what they should have done was
to host a serious debate among relevant experts, skeptics vs. no skeptics.

other words, one crucial function of journalists is to know their subject well
enough to consider an array of informed views, match them up against each
other, and let readers know that there’s at least an important debate to


below, or write Pressroom at

Follow Pressroom on Facebook or on Twitter.

(Murrow and Terkel photos from and the University of Chicago)

CORRECTION: A previous version of this post incorrectly stated the year that Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams faced each other in a presidential campaign.