Much to my disappointment, Jim Hopkins decided to hang it up last
Who, you ask?
For years Hopkins maintained the Gannet Blog, which kept an eye on the Gannett
newspaper chain as it struggled through the implosion of the mainstream news
industry over the last decade. Hopkins, a former Gannett employee, was a sort
of highly specialized Romenesko, covering just one news organization – albeit one
with outlets all over the country, including 10 daily papers in Wisconsin.
I haven’t found a data point yet,
but it’s my sense that a huge number of working journalists have time at a
Gannett property somewhere in their job history. (Two, including one that’s now
a former Gannett paper, are on my
resumé.) That, along with the company’s status as the largest publisher of
newspapers in the country – topped by its ownership of the national paper USA
Today – has made the company an essential part of any media beat.
Of course, “newspapers” is becoming
a bit of a linguistic anachronism. When the AP moves stories picked up from
Gannett publications, it now attributes them to “[insert publication name here]
Media” to reflect the company’s increasingly digital orientation.
Despite its huge presence in the country, Gannett has been awfully
uninformative about its repeated downsizings. So for keeping up on the ups
and downs – almost always downs – of the corporation, Hopkins’ blog has been
indispensable. I told him as much in an email message in which I expressed
regret at his decision to shut down.
In his farewell post, Hopkins explains
that Gannett’s latest move – acquiring the 20-TV-station Belo Corp. – has
turned the company from a newspaper chain owning TV stations into
TV giant with a side interest in newspapers, its mainstay business since 1906,
when Frank Gannett founded the company with a single daily in Elmira, N.Y.
And that, he indicates, was the
most immediate impetus for deciding it was time to call it a day and move on to
something else. But before doing so, Hopkins served up as well a look back at
Gannett’s last decade, in
a long feature story (primarily sourced from clips and his blog) in the
manner of one of those classic front-page features the Wall Street Journal used to run and gave up on after being acquired
by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. – or
perhaps those section-front cover stories at USA Today, where Hopkins worked
before leaving in one of Gannett’s many downsizings.
I asked Hopkins to reflect from his vantage point on the Dairy
State in particular as part of the company’s long-term future.
“Wisconsin is a good candidate for
a Gannett newspaper strategy that’s only beginning to unfold across the
company's 81 community dailies,” Hopkins wrote back.
“The company is moving toward a
regional news-gathering and publishing structure where a single editor is
responsible for several dailies. That means even more shared content than some
readers are already seeing. Wisconsin is a good candidate because the company
owns 10 newspapers in the state.
“Eventually, I can imagine them
being merged together into one or two big regional papers with 10 individual
websites where there were once free-standing papers. The cost-savings will be
too hard for the company to resist.
states with Gannett papers where this is already happening include
Louisiana, New York, New Jersey plus North and South Carolina.”
I was also curious what his thoughts were on the possibility we
could see Gannett acquire some other key Wisconsin newspaper properties –
specifically, the Lee Enterprises chain (which owns papers in LaCrosse, Racine,
and other cities as well as part of the company that publishes the Wisconsin State Journal), or perhaps
even the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. (Understand,
no one, nowhere, has suggested that any such deals are even on anyone’s radar
“I can't imagine Gannett buying any more newspapers, no
matter the price,” Hopkins said. “It probably would consider buying more TV
Whether that will really help Gannett as it continues to
struggle, however, is an open question. The latest financials don’t
look good. Or in
the words of Columbia Journalism
Review’s Ryan Chittum, “if
you’re going to charge people for journalism, you have to invest in journalism.”
Well, at least they won’t have Hopkins to kick them around
anymore. More’s the pity.
below, or write Pressroom at email@example.com.
Follow Pressroom on Facebook or on Twitter.